In 1994, I was hired by ECHO Inc. to head up their
Engineering Department, which at the time was a small group of
capable technicians and engineers that made changes and
improvements to existing products. The bulk of the design of new
products was handled by our parent company, Kioritz Corporation,
located in Ome, a suburb of Tokyo, Japan. Kioritz and by default
Echo had a fine reputation for quality, making several different
professional products that utilized their mainstay two stroke
engine. Among these were leaf blowers.
One day while I was talking with our Vice President of
Marketing and Sales about the current state of leaf blowers in
the marketplace, I discovered that there was a movement,
primarily in California, that was attempting to convince cities
that leaf blowers were too noisy and should be banned. To be
honest, at that time, they were quite difficult to listen to at
close range. Even at some distance, one could tell if it was a
leaf blower over a lawn mower, for example, because most of them
had a telltale whistle or scream emanating from the primary
blower fan. People claimed that blowers were too loud, but the
real problem was that they were irritating due to the high
pitched sound they generated.
We decided that we needed to develop a quiet version for
those communities that objected to the traditional design. It
was a good faith effort to show our concern over the complaints
we were hearing. I told Joe that I had some experience at sound
attenuating diesel powered generators at the Kohler Company in
Wisconsin. So I went to work on the project with confidence that
I could put an end to these field complaints.
I took our largest blower at the time and with my engineers,
technicians and computer designers began a study to identify
where exactly the different audible sounds and frequencies were
coming from on the unit. The easiest to identify was the source
of the high pitched whine, which was coming from the impeller
blades within the main blower housing. Another source of noise
was the exhaust muffler, which at that time was intended mainly
to prevent sparks without introducing a power robbing back
pressure on the two stroke engine. We also found that the
combustion air intake was a contributor for there was always a
bit of blowback coming from the air cleaner that sounded a lot
like a muffled exhaust sound. Finally, there was the sound of
the internal explosion itself that emanated through the wall of
the air cooled engine to the cooling fins which tended to
convert combustion vibration to an audible sound.
Each unique sound in turn, from the loudest to the least
audible, was diminished to where it would blend in with the
background noise of the engine. Without these visible peaks on
the sound spectrum analyzer, the sound of the blower became
indistinguishable from other lawn care products; however the
overall sound level still was higher than we wanted. To
accomplish our final goal, we developed a new exhaust muffler,
an air cleaner with a patented sound attenuator and an engine
housing that had sound attenuating materials (foam) bonded to
the inside of the housing to absorb combustion noises. In
addition, the hard plastic housing material was a special
composite with sound deadening and vibration absorbing capabilities. As a result,
at 65 dB(A), we achieved a 75% reduction in overall sound and we
did it at no additional cost to the consumer and with no loss in
performance. The design turned out to be an award winning
concept that revolutionized the leaf blower industry. In
subsequent years, Echo redesigned all their leaf blowers to a
new sound reduced Standard.
It happened at that time that emissions became an issue at
the government level and our entire line had to be modified and
improved. In the process, special attention was given to the
concept of sound attenuation. Every new blower was significantly
quieter than the one it replaced, most achieving at least a 50%
reduction in sound. Several paralleled the original design in
that they were 75% quieter. The most significant improvement to
all Echo leaf blowers was and is the elimination or attenuation
of the impeller whine so prevalent in older designs.
The hope in all this was that those wanting to do something
about leaf blower noise would now have an alternative to
banning. As I write this article in late 2010, I find that we
have made great strides in educating communities to the facts
about leaf blowers, but still there are some that find these
facts difficult to accept. What the anti-leaf blower activists
have not accepted is that they have won. Because of their
persistence, the industry has spent millions of dollars to
improve the leaf blower and has gone the extra mile to provide
educational materials that can be used to teach operators in the
proper way to use a blower. Both Echo Inc. and the Outdoor Power
Equipment Institute (OPEI) have created manuals that explain
what the issues are and what must be done to make using a leaf
blower acceptable to others.
It is my hope that one day soon; anti-leaf blower activists
will abandon their effort to create an unenforceable leaf blower
ban and begin to lobby instead for a worthwhile ordinance that
eliminates old, noisy and exhaust polluting products. They
should help communities set up training programs in local trade
schools for professional operators and make training manuals
available to private citizens and homeowners. In addition, their
new ordinance should limit the hours of blower use to normal
business hours and days of the week.
For detailed information suggesting how all these suggestions
can be accomplished, including a recommended workable ordinance,
see the following web site:
http://www.leafblowernoise.com/.
Larry Will, Consultant
Echo Inc.
(479) 250-4110
[email protected]
11-18-2010